Re: CLang wrong analysis?
Re: CLang wrong analysis?
- Subject: Re: CLang wrong analysis?
- From: Jean-Denis Muys <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 07:51:59 +0000
- Thread-topic: CLang wrong analysis?
On 28 mars 2011, at 22:15, Sean McBride wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:05:47 -0300, Bavarious said:
>
>> This is a CSA bug that has already been reported and fixed by the LLVM team:
>>
>> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9541
>>
>> As described in the bug report, you can define the variable inside the
>> for expression as a workaround for this static analyser bug, or you
>> could wait until Apple release another version of Xcode+Clang including
>> the fix.
>
> Or build a newer version of the analyzer yourself and redirect Xcode to
> use it:
> <http://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/xcode.html>
>
> Assuming those instructions still work for Xcode 4 (anyone tried?), but
> they certainly work for 3.
>
> --
Thanks everybody. Since it's already fixed, I guess I won't create a new bug report.
Building a newer version of Clang is an interesting proposition. I haven't tried it with Xcode 4, so I have no idea whether the published instructions still work.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden