Re: LLVM GCC 4.2 & -fno-optimize-sibling-calls FAIL
Re: LLVM GCC 4.2 & -fno-optimize-sibling-calls FAIL
- Subject: Re: LLVM GCC 4.2 & -fno-optimize-sibling-calls FAIL
- From: Chris Lattner <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:01:54 -0700
On Jun 18, 2012, at 9:59 PM, David M. Cotter wrote:
> am i out of luck while i'm stuck on this compiler?
Unfortunately, yes. If you are using Xcode 3.2.6, you can optionally use "plain gcc" like you were. Newer Xcode releases do not support PowerPC, and older ones are not updated.
-Chris
>
> On Jun 17, 2012, at 11:58 PM, David M. Cotter wrote:
>
>> that's probably it, i'm using Xcode 3.2.6 because i need to support my PPC customers.
>>
>> 11E53, Apple clang version 1.7 (tags/apple/clang-77) (based on LLVM 2.9svn)
>>
>> On Jun 8, 2012, at 6:36 AM, Dave Zarzycki wrote:
>>
>>> Newer versions of clang appear to support this flag. What version of Xcode/clang are you using?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jun 7, 2012, at 11:33 PM, David M. Cotter <email@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>>> when i was using "plain old" GCC 4.2, i could specify "-fno-optimize-sibling-calls" in "other C / C++ flags", and my stack frames would NOT be optimized out in a crash report call stack.
>>>>
>>>> since updating to LLVM, they now ARE optimized out.
>>>>
>>>> how can i get the stack frames back? i do NOT want them optimized out.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden