Re: Will we ever be able to refactor C++?
Re: Will we ever be able to refactor C++?
- Subject: Re: Will we ever be able to refactor C++?
- From: Jean-Daniel Dupas <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 16:40:56 +0100
Le 26 janv. 2013 à 16:20, Jeffrey Walton <email@hidden> a écrit :
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Jean-Daniel Dupas
> <email@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Le 25 janv. 2013 à 17:53, Jeffrey Walton <email@hidden> a écrit :
>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Tom Davie <email@hidden> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 25 Jan 2013, at 08:50, Rick Mann <email@hidden> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ...
>>>>
>>> Things could get tricky because neither Apple nor Google are good
>>> about pushing changes back upstream in a usable way.
>>
>> Look like you don't have any clue about how the LLVM/clang project works.
> True. I just use it, work around the problems I encounter, and file the RADARs.
>
> Any chance we can get fixes and changes to `ld` pushed to BinUtil
> folks? I'm in a situation where Apple's `ld` is not honoring flags,
> and BinUtil's `ld` lacks the awareness needed to be useful.
>
I don't think so.
Apple ld (aka ld64) doesn't have anything to do with GNU ld, and is a completely unrelated linker (see http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/ld64/ ).
Moreover, it may be replaced (in the long term) by a LLVM based linker: http://lld.llvm.org (which is in "very early stages of development").
-- Jean-Daniel
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden