Re: AudioConverter footprint
Re: AudioConverter footprint
- Subject: Re: AudioConverter footprint
- From: tahome izwah <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 19:15:20 +0200
So even if you knew the memory footprint of a converter now, who would
guarantee that it stays that way? I think this is very dangerous - who
knows what the footprint of a particular converter might be in a
future OS release... I would NEVER ever rely on such an implementation
detail in any software product.
--th
2009/6/27 Evan Olcott <email@hidden>:
> In this particular case, it's PCM conversions from one format to the
> canonical format. No sample rate conversion.
>
> On Jun 26, 2009, at 3:30 PM, Doug Wyatt wrote:
>
>> Much depends... is it a codec or is it just converting one form of PCM to
>> another? is there a sample rate conversion?
>>
>> A codec has far more state than a PCM converter. Sample rate converters
>> create a need for some internal buffering...
>
> Ev
> Technical Knowledge Officer
> Head Programmer/Designer
> Audiofile Engineering
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden