Re: Xquartz version change?
Re: Xquartz version change?
- Subject: Re: Xquartz version change?
- From: Peter O'Gorman <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:44:34 -0600
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
>> Well, then sorry for any confusion. Kick fink to do it the right way.
>
> Tell me the right way to get a version for every X11 that has worked on
> Mac OS X 10.3 and later, and I'll pass that along.
Ok - this reply may have been too hasty - I am sure that fink will find
a way to work around the version number change.
I just do not like changes such as this. Assuming that noone is going to
parse version output does not make sense. Jumping backwards from 7.x to
1.x similarly.
I did not think that darwin versions going from 1.x to 5.x was good, but
at least that was still an increase :-)
Not something worth fighting about though.
Peter
--
Peter O'Gorman
http://pogma.com
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
X11-users mailing list (email@hidden)
This email sent to email@hidden