• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: gcc 4.2 not the default?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gcc 4.2 not the default?


  • Subject: Re: gcc 4.2 not the default?
  • From: David Dunham <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 11:46:24 -0700

On 8 Aug 2008, at 09:35, Paul Russell wrote:

ICC doesn't support Objective-C, which is a problem for many. :)

One would hope that any performance-critical code is written in C, but I don't know how easy/practical it is to mix and match low- level C code compiled with ICC and GUI Objective-C code compiled with gcc (?).


That's a premature optimization...

I think LLVM also has the problem of not dealing with C++.

David Dunham   Macintosh Game Developer
GameHouse Studios     +1 206 926 5722     www.gamehouse.com
    "They said it couldn't be done but sometimes it doesn't
     work out that way." -- Casey Stengel

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >gcc 4.2 not the default? (From: Andy O'Meara <email@hidden>)
 >Re: gcc 4.2 not the default? (From: Paul Russell <email@hidden>)
 >Re: gcc 4.2 not the default? (From: "Sean McBride" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: gcc 4.2 not the default? (From: Paul Russell <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: PackageMaker 3 Question
  • Next by Date: Re: Shark won't show symbols for release build
  • Previous by thread: Re: gcc 4.2 not the default?
  • Next by thread: Re: gcc 4.2 not the default?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread