Re: Source Text of Script Objects
Re: Source Text of Script Objects
- Subject: Re: Source Text of Script Objects
- From: Arthur J Knapp <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 17:23:00 -0500
>
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 10:37:20 -0800
>
Subject: Re: Source Text of Script Objects
>
From: Paul Berkowitz <email@hidden>
>
On 12/31/01 10:13 AM, "Arthur J Knapp" <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> script theScript
>
> string {theScript}
>
Well, the _script_ is vanilla, but all it does is error in Script Editor
>
Can't get string {<<script theScript>>}
>
>
Same in SD.
>
>
So if it's doing something else for you on OS 9, it might be the Jon's
>
coercion everyone else was having fun with. Or another one.
Whoops...
Christopher Stone reminded me that simply moving a Scripting Addition
out of the Scripting Additions folder does not immediately "unload" it.
I was indeed getting a coercion from Jon's Commands. Sorry for the
confusion. :)
When Apple went and obtained the clipboard commands, why didn't they
just pay Jon Pugh for his entire osax? Most of Jon's commands really
SHOULD be a part of Standard Additions, (or better yet, simply built
into the native language). :)
{ Arthur J. Knapp, of <
http://www.STELLARViSIONs.com>
<
mailto:email@hidden>
try
<
http://maccentral.macworld.com/columns/briggs.shtml>
on error number -128
end try
}