Re: is there a reason not to change "Applications (Mac OS 9)"
Re: is there a reason not to change "Applications (Mac OS 9)"
- Subject: Re: is there a reason not to change "Applications (Mac OS 9)"
- From: garbanzito <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:38:51 -0600
at 6/12/01, 1:13 PM -0400, they whom i call Michael Turner wrote:
Is there a reason not to change the folder named "Applications (Mac OS 9)"
to just "Applications",
there's no strictly Mac OS 9.1 reason that i know of, but
it would interfere with putting Mac OS X on the same
partition, because Mac OS X puts global (all user)
applications in a folder called "Applications" on the top
level of the boot volume. also, i wouldn't be surprised if
Mac OS X looks specifically for "Applications (Mac OS 9)"
for Classic apps, regardless of whether it's on the same
partition.
steve harley email@hidden