Re: is there a reason not to change "Applications (Mac OS 9)"
Re: is there a reason not to change "Applications (Mac OS 9)"
- Subject: Re: is there a reason not to change "Applications (Mac OS 9)"
- From: Michael Turner <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 10:36:22 -0400
>
There's usually be a good reason for something like that. The reason here, I
>
think, is that if/when you move to OS X, especially if it's on the same disk
>
partition as OS 9.1 you'll probably totally screw up your whole system by
>
having done that. OSX has its own Applications folder where many things need
>
to be, and which probably shouldn't be mixed up with OS 9 stuff. Even when
>
you upgrade to OS 9.2, due very soon, it will probably install a new
>
Applications (OS 9) folder. Ah well, if things like the name of a folder
>
mean so much to you that you force a change that the OS doesn't want to
>
permit, you'll have to figure out how to deal with the consequences.
Paul,
I like it MY way.... Yeah, I've been paying for that for 32 years.
Think different!
:-)
Thanks for your response. I was anticipating something like that. Mostly, I
wanted to know if it will screw something up immediately.
/Michael