• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Sort of [OT]: Raw Codes Database
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Sort of [OT]: Raw Codes Database


  • Subject: Re: Sort of [OT]: Raw Codes Database
  • From: Paul Berkowitz <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2002 09:56:29 -0800

On 12/31/01 10:25 AM, "Emmanuel" <email@hidden> wrote:

> Actually the "Translate Into Raw Code" command of Smile translates the
> terms of the Scripting Additions and the terms of AppleScript into raw
> codes, so finally it may be easier with Smile. (SD is a fine product,
> though).
>
> "Translate Into Raw Code" is a recent feature of Smile: you may need to
> visit <http://homepage.mac.com/satimage/>

Emmanuel,

You're right - I haven't looked at that feature yet. But I can't get to any
iDisk page at the moment, not even my own. I'll keep trying to download the
latest versions as soon as I can get to the Smile download page.

The ability to look at the dictionary of the applescript extension (and now
"component" in OSX) has always been a singular advantage of Smile. If you
can now do it in raw codes too - even better!

My original question here concerned being able to find one of those raw
codes that _doesn't_ have an English-type equivalent (like <<class ktxt>>).
In this particular case (a way to get the source text of a compiled script
in OS X with no access to the Jon's coercion) there doesn't seem to be one.
It would be great to be able to browse in "raw-code-space" of Apple events
to look around, but I guess such a place doesn't exist either.

I was wondering whether there was any way to do this (get the source text of
a compiled script) with the Satimage osax's resource commands? The simple
way, as someone has already mentioned, with a complete script file is just
to open it and get the contents of document 1". But what about <<script
foo>> within it, or <<handler bar>> within it?

--
Paul Berkowitz


  • Prev by Date: Re: Source Text of Script Objects
  • Next by Date: Smile for AS 1.7?
  • Previous by thread: Re: osax wish list - was : Source Text of Script Objects
  • Next by thread: Smile for AS 1.7?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread