Re: OT: Re: it's all true
Re: OT: Re: it's all true
- Subject: Re: OT: Re: it's all true
- From: Emile Schwarz <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 10:10:16 +0200
Hi all,
I second what John Fowler say in a way.
What I fear is that Apple goes 'one step too far'. For me, it is not only a
matter of Intel but ...
how many line of 68K code was in the last Mac OS for PPC ?
how hard was the 68K to PPC transition ?
how hard was the PPC go G3, G4, G5 transition ?
so now the question is:
are the software sales worth the development cost for the transition from Mac OS
X for PowerPC processors to the Pentium IV / Intel processors ?
Do you remember Borland talks when Apple introduce the PowerPC (yeah, back in
the early 90s) ? An we do not saw a single application from Borland.
So people (sorry, companies) who said "We will be there" can change their mind.
Actually, I do not care about QuarkXPress, PhotoShop, Illustrator, PageMaker
(dead ?), InDesign (still there ?) and all of those very expensive software. Bu
I am not the Apple Macintosh Computing market. Here the problem lies.
Well, we have at least a year to date to wait and we will know.
Back to AppleScript, and wait for some bug squash in the (future) 10.4.2, maybe.
Cheers,
Emile
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Applescript-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden