Re: TextEdit, is it really that lame?
Re: TextEdit, is it really that lame?
- Subject: Re: TextEdit, is it really that lame?
- From: Bill Briggs <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 19:34:16 -0400
At 10:34 PM +0000 3/7/06, kai wrote:
>On 7 Mar 2006, at 22:03, Bill Briggs wrote:
>
>>At 9:08 PM +0000 3/7/06, kai wrote:
>>>On 7 Mar 2006, at 14:28, Bill Briggs wrote:
>>>
>>>>It appears that the only way to get a new paragraph in a TextEdit document is to put in a slug of text with a return in it. Is this thing really that lame?
>>>
>>>Evidently so, Bill.
>>
>> Oy. How sad is that? I'm doing a brief AppleScript tutorial on Friday and have had to ask the lab admin to load Tex-Edit Plus on all of the machines.
>>
>> I wish Apple would eat its own dogfood.
>
>It is indeed a sad reflection that, to demonstrate some of the best features of AppleScript, one seems forced to hold up third-party software as a model of implementation. At least now, you'll have the option of including mention of another currently under-utilised feature that might assist those on the nursery slopes of the AS learning curve: recordability. ;-)
Yes, Tex-Edit Plus' recordability is yet another bonus.
- web
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Applescript-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden