• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: TextEdit, is it really that lame?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: TextEdit, is it really that lame?


  • Subject: Re: TextEdit, is it really that lame?
  • From: Brennan <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 23:57:58 +0100

On 7/3/06 at 19:35, John C. Welch <email@hidden> wrote:

> VBA's object model actually, but yes, that's the reason why.
> They don't have the luxury or manpower to duplicate both
> implementations

Woah! Something that Microsoft can't afford?

AppleScript implementors must be more expensive than I thought! ;)

On a more serious note, Adobe has got this particular cat* skinned very
nicely, IMO. I'm just longing for them to set the scripting dev team loose
on Flash...



*(AS+JS+VB interfaces)

--
Brennan Young

"Software gets slower faster than hardware gets faster."

-Nikolas Wirth
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Applescript-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: TextEdit, is it really that lame?
      • From: "John C. Welch" <email@hidden>
    • Re: TextEdit, is it really that lame?
      • From: Martin Orpen <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: TextEdit, is it really that lame? (From: "John C. Welch" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: InDesign XiNet Picture Wrangler GUI Scripting (Alex Kaczun)
  • Next by Date: Re: TextEdit, is it really that lame?
  • Previous by thread: Re: TextEdit, is it really that lame?
  • Next by thread: Re: TextEdit, is it really that lame?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread