Re: TextEdit, is it really that lame?
Re: TextEdit, is it really that lame?
- Subject: Re: TextEdit, is it really that lame?
- From: Martin Orpen <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 23:26:36 +0000
On 16 Mar 2006, at 10:57 pm, Brennan wrote:
On 7/3/06 at 19:35, John C. Welch <email@hidden> wrote:
VBA's object model actually, but yes, that's the reason why.
They don't have the luxury or manpower to duplicate both
implementations
Woah! Something that Microsoft can't afford?
AppleScript implementors must be more expensive than I thought! ;)
On a more serious note, Adobe has got this particular cat* skinned
very
nicely, IMO. I'm just longing for them to set the scripting dev
team loose
on Flash...
*(AS+JS+VB interfaces)
Hopefully that isn't top of their "to do" items.
Their flagship app can't carry out any operation close to the speed
of the Mac OS, they've missed the move to Intel and their latest app
is a Mac-only mess of Lua and Cocoa.
"Longhorn" is Adobe's "Godot".
--
Martin Orpen
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Applescript-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden