Re: TextEdit, is it really that lame?
Re: TextEdit, is it really that lame?
- Subject: Re: TextEdit, is it really that lame?
- From: "John C. Welch" <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 18:20:13 -0600
- Thread-topic: TextEdit, is it really that lame?
On 3/16/06 16:57, "Brennan" <email@hidden> wrote:
>> VBA's object model actually, but yes, that's the reason why.
>> They don't have the luxury or manpower to duplicate both
>> implementations
>
> Woah! Something that Microsoft can't afford?
>
> AppleScript implementors must be more expensive than I thought! ;)
Heh...no, the MacBU is just much smaller than you think ;-)
>
> On a more serious note, Adobe has got this particular cat* skinned very
> nicely, IMO. I'm just longing for them to set the scripting dev team loose
> on Flash...
Not in Acrobat they don't, but the Acrobat team hates humans anyway, at
least by the way their applications work.
Considering that the other Adobe applications didn't ever have platform -
specific baggage with regard to to scripting, I'm not surprised they have an
easier time of it
--
Love is a merry elf dancing a happy jig, when suddenly, he turns on you with
a submachine gun.
Matt Groening
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Applescript-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden