• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: TextEdit, is it really that lame?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: TextEdit, is it really that lame?


  • Subject: Re: TextEdit, is it really that lame?
  • From: "John C. Welch" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 18:20:13 -0600
  • Thread-topic: TextEdit, is it really that lame?

On 3/16/06 16:57, "Brennan" <email@hidden> wrote:

>> VBA's object model actually, but yes, that's the reason why.
>> They don't have the luxury or manpower to duplicate both
>> implementations
>
> Woah! Something that Microsoft can't afford?
>
> AppleScript implementors must be more expensive than I thought! ;)

Heh...no, the MacBU is just much smaller than you think ;-)

>
> On a more serious note, Adobe has got this particular cat* skinned very
> nicely, IMO. I'm just longing for them to set the scripting dev team loose
> on Flash...

Not in Acrobat they don't, but the Acrobat team hates humans anyway, at
least by the way their applications work.

Considering that the other Adobe applications didn't ever have platform -
specific baggage with regard to to scripting, I'm not surprised they have an
easier time of it


--
Love is a merry elf dancing a happy jig, when suddenly, he turns on you with
a submachine gun.

Matt Groening


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Applescript-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Re: TextEdit, is it really that lame? (From: Brennan <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: TextEdit, is it really that lame?
  • Next by Date: NSContainerSpecifierError?
  • Previous by thread: Re: TextEdit, is it really that lame?
  • Next by thread: Re: TextEdit, is it really that lame?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread