Re: Battery or AC?
Re: Battery or AC?
- Subject: Re: Battery or AC?
- From: kai <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 14:27:12 +0000
On 3 Nov 2006, at 14:01, Mark J. Reed wrote:
I'm confused, kai.
Looking at the results you're getting, I'm not too surprised, Mark.
Clearly there's a difference between the results returned from our
respective machines - which means that my suggestion can't be
considered as a general approach.
To demonstrate why I suggested what I did, I've added the output from
my test machine for comparison:
This is the entire output of "pmset -g" on my laptop:
Currently in use:
womp 1
dps 1
dim 0
reduce 0
autorestart 0
spindown 10
sleep 0
acwake 0
lidwake 1
ring 0
No AC connection:
----------------
Active Profiles:
Battery Power 1*
AC Power -1
Currently in use:
acwake 0
sleep 10
autorestart 0
ring 0
halfdim 1
reduce 0
disksleep 10
displaysleep 2
lidwake 1
lessbright 1
----------------
With AC connection:
----------------
Active Profiles:
Battery Power 1
AC Power -1*
Currently in use:
womp 1
acwake 0
sleep 70
autorestart 0
ring 1
halfdim 1
reduce 0
disksleep 10
displaysleep 43
lidwake 1
----------------
And here's the output of "pmset -g cap"
Capabilities:
dim
spindown
sleep
reduce
dps
womp
ring
acwake
autorestart
lidwake
No AC connection:
----------------
Capabilities for Battery Power:
displaysleep
disksleep
sleep
reduce
ring
acwake
autorestart
lidwake
lessbright
halfdim
----------------
With AC connection:
----------------
Capabilities for AC Power:
displaysleep
disksleep
sleep
reduce
womp
ring
acwake
autorestart
lidwake
halfdim
----------------
Back to the drawing board, I guess. I wonder if the profiles, etc.
are available elsewhere on your machine...
---
kai
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
AppleScript-Users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
Archives: http://lists.apple.com/mailman//archives/applescript-users
This email sent to email@hidden