Re: List oddity
Re: List oddity
OK, this is starting to ring a bell. I'm just surprised it hasn't come up more often.
I'm going to file a new bug report, maybe I'm not the only one who needs reminding.
ES
On Aug 3, 2010, at 12:04pm, Paul Berkowitz wrote:
> On 8/3/10 3:47 AM, "Nigel Garvey" <email@hidden>
> wrote:
>
>> It's been like that for many years. For some reason, when you directly
>> coerce a list containing a reference in its source code, the items at
>> and after the reference don't appear in the result. You have to 'get'
>> the list first to resolve the reference(s).
>
>
> Stepping back a pace or two, it really is a pretty crummy language that
> behaves this way and isn't fixed after all these years, no? Users should not
> have to work around stuff like this, reinventing the wheel every time
> someone runs into it for the first, or hundredth, time. I doubt it's even
> written up in the documentation (ASLG), or is it?
>
> --
> Paul Berkowitz
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> AppleScript-Users mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> Archives: http://lists.apple.com/archives/applescript-users
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
AppleScript-Users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
Archives: http://lists.apple.com/archives/applescript-users
This email sent to email@hidden