Re: Sierra Gatekeeper question.
Re: Sierra Gatekeeper question.
- Subject: Re: Sierra Gatekeeper question.
- From: phil stokes <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:54:28 +0700
On 17 Jun 2016, at 03:17, Matt Deatherage < email@hidden> wrote:
This is rapidly becoming an outmoded way of thinking, as attackers increasingly find value in whatever they can get from you.
Thanks, Matt. You make some good points.
On 17 Jun 2016, at 06:48, Shane Stanley < email@hidden> wrote: That checking isn't confined to a particular time. Signed apps that have been tampered with won't run. That equates to a level of protection for the life of the app.
Yes, I was aware of that, but in light of Matt’s points, I can see how that is a significant benefit.
like I was some kind of blithering idiot,
You read too much into that, but you certainly justified that self-description subsequently.
Phil
|
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
applescriptobjc-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden