• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: EOF Advocacy, Open Source?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: EOF Advocacy, Open Source?


  • Subject: Re: EOF Advocacy, Open Source?
  • From: Finlay Dobbie <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 23:55:05 +0100

Apple doesn't want its frameworks to turn over-bloated with a function for everything you could possibly ever want to do. I think their attitude is "you can make frameworks for a reason" -- i.e. if there should be a community effort of any type it should be something like MiscKit.

-- Finlay

On Monday, August 13, 2001, at 11:22 pm, Ed Baskerville wrote:

Another thing: why doesn't Apple create an infrastructure for third-party
open-source classes and frameworks to be rolled into Cocoa?

I think that's something that would be worth pursuing for Apple; done right,
it could add a lot of cool features to Cocoa quickly. Again, Think Darwin.
Obviously I'm not expecting the stuff Apple develops internally to become
open source, since Cocoa is decidedly in the
we-won't-open-source-this-because-it's-proprietary category. But allowing
open-source development of add-ons that eventually became part of the Apple
frameworks would be very cool.


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: EOF Advocacy, Open Source?
      • From: Scott Anguish <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: EOF Advocacy, Open Source? (From: "Ed Baskerville" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Open Source?
  • Next by Date: Re: Open Source?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Open Source?
  • Next by thread: Re: EOF Advocacy, Open Source?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread