• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
mySQL framework
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

mySQL framework


  • Subject: mySQL framework
  • From: Max J Cantor <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 01:52:44 -0400 (EDT)

This may be the inappropriate, but, would anyone be interested in
collaborating on a project to create cocoa wrappers for the mysql
libraries? I might be wrong, but wouldn't that address this problem?

-Max

On Wed, 13 Jun 2001 email@hidden wrote:

> > Your needs are your needs and they are not the needs of the average
> >developer! The fact that you have quite effectively and capably dealt
> >with databases involving millions of records per table and requiring 15+
> >page SQL statements using 23-way joins is damned impressive....
> >
> > .... and completely outside of the realm of the needs of an average
> >developer!
>
> Actually, those extremes we both mentioned were actually things we've seen
> that represent a small portion of what we do and are things that we
> specifically DON'T think EOF is good for. We got a little off-topic (and
> took it off-list, BTW) in the discussion, but even if our needs were that
> peculiar, why should Apple take away the existing functionality? That's our
> main point. Not that they should cater new development to the niche
> markets, but that they shouldn't take away the robust set of Enteprise
> tools that were already a part of the system before they removed them.
>
> There are a great many small scale applications out there for the Mac --
> that have been slowly disappearing -- for such things as Doctors, Dentists
> and Law Office management. There are a lot of FileMaker-based solutions
> that are rather weak compared to what is available for Windows. I think
> that there IS a need and a demand for being able to quickly put together
> database front-ends. Especially given the ease of Cocoa to learn, someone
> who is a Doctor, Lawyer, or whatever but who has some programming
> experience could put together some really great stuff.
>
> I also think that a tool like EOF/Cocoa is imperative to getting
> penetration into the Enterprise market. If they don't get Apple's inside
> corporations, they are never going to increase market share. Maybe that's
> not important, but I'd like to see it happen.
>
> And I think you actually made my point in your e-mail. EOF and a database
> like Frontbase or OpenBase gives a small developer a chance to create some
> really great software quickly, which helps the platform.
>
> So, sorry for the little SQL-pissing match we got into. You're right - it
> was outside the scope of this list, but I don't think because our needs are
> something of a niche is no need to dismiss EOF/Cocoa's potential or
> usefulness to developers at large.
>
> Jeff
>
> P.S. I just got a Ti-Book and I have nobody to tell.. =)
> _______________________________________________
> cocoa-dev mailing list
> email@hidden
> http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev


References: 
 >Re: Cocoa/EOF for non-enterprise apps Re: proof of cocoa (From: email@hidden)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Cocoa, a complete Mac OS X API?
  • Next by Date: Re: Detecting Keydowns
  • Previous by thread: Re: Cocoa/EOF for non-enterprise apps Re: proof of cocoa
  • Next by thread: Re: Cocoa/EOF for non-enterprise apps Re: proof of cocoa
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread