• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Would Any Developers Use This?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Would Any Developers Use This?


  • Subject: Re: Would Any Developers Use This?
  • From: Bill Bumgarner <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2001 17:30:52 -0400

The goals may be different, but the underlying foundation and mechanisms are ideally suited for managing Carbon/Cocoa application installation and updates.

It is, after all, built on top of the debian package manager which quite easily handles several thousand packages with complex dependencies and a wide range of licenses.

While it may not be appropriate to include the package descriptions for commercial OSX apps in Fink [I actually believe it is-- just separate them such that you have, say, an unstable/commercial and stable/commercial tree(
s)], Fink provides an excellent starting point if a motivated developer wanted to solve this problem.

b.bum

On Sunday, September 9, 2001, at 02:46 PM, Finlay Dobbie wrote:

Fink is not meant for the same thing. Fink is meant to create a distribution of free software patched and ready to go on OS X/Darwin, not to manage the automatic updating of Carbon/Cocoa applications. Different goals.

b.bum
In cyberspace, no one can hear you laugh.


References: 
 >Re: Would Any Developers Use This? (From: Finlay Dobbie <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Would Any Developers Use This?
  • Next by Date: WindowDepthLimit default; Depth vs. performance
  • Previous by thread: Re: Would Any Developers Use This?
  • Next by thread: Re: Would Any Developers Use This?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread