• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: why Obj-C
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: why Obj-C


  • Subject: Re: why Obj-C
  • From: "Erik M. Buck" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 00:40:19 -0600
  • Organization: EMB & Assocites Inc.

I did not write the text attributed to me. Matthew Johnson did. This
particular error in attribution could get me into trouble if certain people
ever pull it up on Google!

I AM a GUI programmer and more :)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ed Silva" <email@hidden>
To: <email@hidden>
Cc: "Erik M. Buck" <email@hidden>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 12:31 AM
Subject: Re: why Obj-C


> "Erik M. Buck" wrote:
>
> > I must confess that I am not a GUI programmer (the last time I did
> > GUI work apart from motif was for windows 3.1). So I
> > am not a good judge of Interface design tools. i just like very
> > much Interface builder. I was not aware it was 14 years
> > old.
>
> If you've done Motif work you have my sympathies. I've been there.
> I had a simple interface done with Motif (a few text fields and a
> few check boxes and buttons and menu items) and it only took about
> 1000 lines of code (including comments and whitespace). With IB and
> Cocoa it takes 0 lines for the interface and only a few to get the
> data. I hate X Windows with a passion, and all the GUI toolkits
> that go with it (GTK+, Qt, Athena, Motif, etc). But I'm not
> bitter. ;-)
>
> >
> > All the languages I have learnt (see above) the most
> > flexible/powerful I know is C. This is why Obj-C has been a bit of
> > a dissappointment for me. I didn't expect to have to learn the
> > language as well the programming methodology/Classes.
>
> I agree. C is the 'One true language', but Obj-C is just a small
> extension to it (as compared to the massive bloat that is C++ and
> the STL). You can still get down and dirty with C in Obj-C, but you
> also have a very nice (once you wrap your head around it) OO
> language to work with that isn't burdensome (as C++ can be).
>
> > Anyways I think I shall continue with Obj-C with less stress in my
> > free time. Maybe I can give it a fairer more
> > considered chance.
>
> Read the Obj-C book, then Hillegass' "Cocoa Programming for Mac OS
> X" and it will all make much more sense.
>
> >
> > Apologies for venting in public :)
> >
> > Matt
>
> We all need to vent sometimes. :-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> --Ed
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: why Obj-C
      • From: Ed Silva <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: why Obj-C (From: Ed Silva <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: why Obj-C
  • Next by Date: Re: why Obj-C
  • Previous by thread: Re: why Obj-C
  • Next by thread: Re: why Obj-C
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread