• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Apple and Developers (was lots of different subjects)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Apple and Developers (was lots of different subjects)


  • Subject: Re: Apple and Developers (was lots of different subjects)
  • From: Ondra Cada <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 13:34:51 +0100

On Sunday, March 24, 2002, at 07:07 , Andrew R. Mitchell wrote:

4) Bring back <insert technology here> - Whether it's EOF, MacApp & ACS, Dylan, V-Twin, Open Transport Streams, etc., there are technologies that certain developers find key to their particular area of expertise

I won't point out the other misunderstandings of yours, since they were repetedly rolled over and over in zillions of similar debates before, but this one I feel is *VERY* important:

_A flexible database-access API is *NOT* "a technology that certain developers find key to their particular area of expertise". It is rather a sine qua non for any environment_.

There is hardly any applications (productivity tools and simple games aside) which could not *VASTLY* benefit from a database acces. You name it:
spreadsheets, accounting apps, presentations, just pretty close to whatever should -- and easily could, be the EOF/ObjC here -- be able to access the database (which might mean a simple flat file for individual users, a huge dedicated server for big companies).

Of course without database access at all Mac OS X would be dead. That is not the case: it does offer database access on different levels; alas, the best of them is a hundred times (not measured of course, just a speech thing, but a speech of one who -- unlike you -- been there and done that, both with EOF and without!), well I say a hundred times less convenient and flexible that EOF has been. Which in turn alas means that instead of "nearly all applications whose users would profit of db access have them" (as it would be with EOF) we have and will have much worse situation of "nearly all applications whose users would buy something other if the app has not db acess would have them".
---
Ondra Cada
OCSoftware: email@hidden http://www.ocs.cz
2K Development: email@hidden http://www.2kdevelopment.cz
private email@hidden http://www.ocs.cz/oc
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Apple and Developers (was lots of different subjects)
      • From: "Andrew R. Mitchell" <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Apple and Developers (was lots of different subjects) (From: "Andrew R. Mitchell" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Cocoa's Popularity
  • Next by Date: Re: Multiple instantiations of variables & class
  • Previous by thread: Re: Apple and Developers (was lots of different subjects)
  • Next by thread: Re: Apple and Developers (was lots of different subjects)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread