Re: EOF (was [objC retain];
Re: EOF (was [objC retain];
- Subject: Re: EOF (was [objC retain];
- From: "James M. Corrigan" <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 07:53:16 -0500
Or then again:
[databaseVendors buildItAndTheyWillCome];
But you are probably right Bill, Apple and Mac OS/X have no business in
the business world and therefore there really is no need for any kind of
database access layer, right?. I mean who would be stupid enough to
want to use a Mac of any kind to access terabytes of database? Or for
that matter gigabytes. And you are absolutely correct, we are much
better off with no abstraction layer whatever if we were to be fool
enough to want to actually access a database (on some other vendors
hardware, of course). Of course, if we did we can just use WebObjects,
in Java; because Java is the greatest client-app development language,
right? No, wait, the greatest server app development language... or is
it... wait, what did the marketing boys tell us? Long-live SQL APIs!
On Thursday, March 28, 2002, at 09:16 AM, Bill Bumgarner wrote:
Or how about:
[databaseVendors
pleaseProvideNativeDriversEvenThoughYouHaveNoBusinessReasonTo];
James Corrigan
IBIX Corp.
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.