Re: CodeWarrior vs. Xcode?
Re: CodeWarrior vs. Xcode?
- Subject: Re: CodeWarrior vs. Xcode?
- From: Florent Pillet <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 10:21:37 +0200
Qt is good on Unix and Windows. The Mac port is ugly at best. It looks
ugly, it feels ugly and you really don't want to ship an app built with
Qt on Mac OS X. Unless your customers don't care about crappy look &
feel, of course.
I worked with Qt quite a bit and have the uttermost respect for this
toolkit, but they completely failed porting it to Mac OS X.
Florent
On 19 avr. 04, at 18:08, Andreas Vvgele wrote:
What about Trolltech's Qt? I'm new to Mac OS X and I haven't looked at
the OS X version of Qt since I plan to use Cocoa and GNUstep in the
future. But AFAIK Qt is quite good. The drawback is that a commercial
license costs USD $1550. But there's a new Qt book available for less
than USD $40 that includes Qt as well as the Borland C++ compiler. The
Windows version included on the CD-ROM can only be used for
non-commercial (non-proprietary?) development but one can probably use
it for evaluation.
--
Florent Pillet, Code Segment email@hidden
Developer tools and end-user products for Palm OS & Mac OS X
ICQ: 117292463
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/fpillet
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.