• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Bindings granularity
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bindings granularity


  • Subject: Re: Bindings granularity
  • From: mmalcolm crawford <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 16:01:31 -0800


On Dec 4, 2004, at 3:44 PM, Lemont Washington wrote:

To clarify, I know this is technically possible, my question is more along the lines of how well does it scale? Say hundreds of bindings etc?

There have been several reports that bindings perform better than the custom code they have replaced. This should not be surprising...

Basically, a binding is replacing *something that would have to be present anyway*, so it's not incurring *unnecessary* overhead. It is also likely in some situations to be able to make additional optimisations that would be tedious for most developers to undertake.

Certainly there will be variations, but a priori there is no reason to think that using bindings instead of custom glue code will lead to worse performance, or lesser scalability.

mmalc
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Bindings granularity (From: Lemont Washington <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Bindings granularity (From: Lemont Washington <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Bindings granularity
  • Next by Date: Re: Bindings granularity
  • Previous by thread: Re: Bindings granularity
  • Next by thread: Re: Bindings granularity
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread