• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: OT? Why are list archive search results so lame?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: OT? Why are list archive search results so lame?


  • Subject: Re: OT? Why are list archive search results so lame?
  • From: Jim Witte <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 03:09:02 -0500

I pulled down all of cocoa-dev last night. It's 68387 files, 300MB
uncompressed, 44MB tarballed.
If it didn't violate the terms of usage, one could tarball the archives and spread them via bittorrent/gnutella. It would save Apple a ton of bandwidth and would spread the burden of hosting such monsters across more than a few people. However, I like being subscribed to the list and don't want to have that status changed (sigh).

For that matter, why does Apple *care* if people can download their development archives? They are *public* archives after all.. Runtime Revolution (www.runrev.com) has a couple of mailing lists, and while I'm not sure if they have a search engine, they do allow you to download the archives - in two forms: by month (only about 60KB zipped), or as one gigantic mbox file (which is currently about 300MB and growing all the time..)

Why Apple doesn't do this is beyond me - that's why I just keep a local copy of *everything* that comes in over this list, the student-dev list, and the applescript-dev list ('sosume' ;-). They get really damn big (cocoa dev is at 2871 messages, student-dev is 109, applescript is at 454, and my Newtontalk archive is a whopping 5000 or so messages big. Yeah, I'll probably never read any of those, but my disk is big, and when it fills up, I'll either delete some stuff, or just get a bigger one, or both..

(<Obligatory plug>: Yes, the Newton IS still alive and kicking, Apple, along with it's codec MP3 player, ATA support - including IBM microdrive, alpha bluetooth support, IrDA support, web *hosting*, and direct Quickdraw screensavers courtesy of moi [not yet released].. Oh, yeah, and the best printed recognizer on the planet (too bad the InkWell code improvements will never be ported back to the StrongARM..), and user integration that's years ahead of anything else.. Including MacOSX. Come to the Worldwide Newton Conference in Paris right after AppleExpo in Paris. See http://wwnc.newtontalk.net/)

Jim Witte
email@hidden
Indiana University CS
--
A vote for Nader is a vote for George Bush.
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: OT? Why are list archive search results so lame?
      • From: Wade Tregaskis <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: OT? Why are list archive search results so lame? (From: "Jonathan 'Wolf' Rentzsch" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: OT? Why are list archive search results so lame? (From: Ilan Volow <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Registering my app as a URL scheme handler
  • Next by Date: Re: OT? Why are list archive search results so lame?
  • Previous by thread: Re: OT? Why are list archive search results so lame?
  • Next by thread: Re: OT? Why are list archive search results so lame?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread