Re: New Spotlight Info
Re: New Spotlight Info
- Subject: Re: New Spotlight Info
- From: Scott Anguish <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 00:59:23 -0500
On Nov 9, 2004, at 12:35 AM, Wade Tregaskis wrote:
This seems dangerously ironic - the NeXT (aka Apple post-modern)
argument against resource forks was that they made it hard to
transfer data between devices & other platforms... yet, I can send a
Classic app via most IM services (those that support AppleDouble)
and via email, but not an app package...
Which do you think is more likely to survive NFS/UFS? :)
I've never wanted nor needed to use UFS, nor NFS - I've tried the
latter, but it never seems to work with MacOS X (using it between
Linux boxes works fine, albeit after some tweaking).
List mom here..
Please, let's not go down the forked file discussion road. It's
been discussed and decided.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden