Re: New looks [not] replacing Metal?
Re: New looks [not] replacing Metal?
- Subject: Re: New looks [not] replacing Metal?
- From: "Sean McBride" <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:01:59 -0400
- Organization: Rogue Research
On 2005-07-29 13:05, Michael Ströck said:
>I agree. In general, though, I think that brushed metal and the
>unified look make much more sense. In "traditional" windows, the
>space between toolbar buttons is just that -- empty and useless space
>that can not even be used for dragging the window around. The
>distiction between titlebar and toolbar is rather arbitrary and
>doesn't really add anything.
On the contrary, the space is not useless at all. It provides
predictability. With the unified look it's much harder to know what
your click will do. Most of the problem is with the toolbar itself
though, clicks between items, clicks on item icons vs item text, clicks
in items with small icons but big labels. With the regular look, the
toolbar is both visually and behaviourally distinct, and that's helpful
to the user.
Look at this image
<http://www.rogue-research.com/seantemp/UnifiedToolbarInXCode.png >
and predict for me what will happen if a drag is started at each of the
red dots. Answers, from left to right:
1) moves window
2) moves window
3) clicks toolbar item
4) clicks toolbar item
5) moves window
6) clicks toolbar item
Notice especially 4 vs 5. 5-10 pixels apart, totally different
behaviour, and exactly the same visual appearance! Yay!
Did you predict 100% correctly? How do you think non-power users will do?
--
____________________________________________________________
Sean McBride, B. Eng email@hidden
Rogue Research www.rogue-research.com
Mac Software Developer Montréal, Québec, Canada
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden