• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Installer
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Installer


  • Subject: Re: Installer
  • From: "Marcus S. Zarra" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 10:23:22 -0700

Just to add another voice in the support of the avoidance of installers.

Unless the app needs to install something in a system area (which is not necessary for almost every application) the app should not use an installer. It should be a simple drag, drop, execute. When the user is done with the application they should expect that they can drag it to their trash and be done with it.

Installers really are not needed and should not be used for user level applications. Developers should have a very good reason before they even consider sticking something in a system area. Now if we are talking about a print driver or another low level item like a device driver then a package/installer makes sense.

Personally, when I run across an application that uses an installer I seriously question if it is worth the hassle. An installer tells me that if I want to remove this application it is going to be a hassle to track down all the junk that got installed.

On Mar 21, 2006, at 10:03 AM, Ondra Cada wrote:

j o a r,

On 21.3.2006, at 17:38, j o a r wrote:

Finally, a lot of apps that have installers today are also using them to install things I'm not the least interested in having. Abusing our (faint) trust in installers. Like M$ Office among other things writing it's installer log file at the root of the file system. Or Stuffit Expander installing it's freaking shared framework. Be gone!

On the other hand, let's be grateful they use installer properly (well, that is, *if* they do -- I fear at least Stuffit stil uses the Vise cr** instead), so that all these things are properly recorded in receipts. That's an extreme advantage of an installer, and solely for it, I *as a user* would happily use packages for *any* install, including the smallest and lest important tic-tac- toe test app :)


In my POV, it's *ways and ways* better than if the apps intalled the stuff their goddamned programmers considered worth installing themselves at the first launch (as I suspect you was advocating, or did I read something too quickly? :))
---
Ondra Čada
OCSoftware: email@hidden http://www.ocs.cz
private email@hidden http://www.ocs.cz/oc



_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Installer
      • From: Ondra Cada <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Installer (From: Stéphane Sudre <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Installer (From: j o a r <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Installer (From: Klaus Wik <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Installer (From: j o a r <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Installer (From: Ondra Cada <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: shadow problem
  • Next by Date: Re: Installer
  • Previous by thread: Re: Installer
  • Next by thread: Re: Installer
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread