Re: ObjC 3D engine
Re: ObjC 3D engine
- Subject: Re: ObjC 3D engine
- From: Jonathan deWerd <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 15:48:53 -0600
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ah yes, 3DKit. I had it specifically in mind when I started my
project, but I drifted away from its design when I used C++ templates
for generic types. I typedefed them so that all the user saw were
types like O3Mat4x4f or O3Mat4x4d, but I must say that C++ seems
really great for making pseudo-native types like that. It is also
ridiculously complex, whiny, "magical" (lots going under the hood)
and difficult to debug. But very, very handy when used in moderation.
Do you (you meaning everyone) think it is worth the effort to make
it "pure" ObjC, and if so should it be done before open sourcing?
Also, on a completely different topic (sorry I drift so much), what
happened to the proposed cocoa-pro list? It appears to be dead but I
can't find any discussions to that effect...
On Jun 23, 2007, at 10:27 PM, mmalc Crawford wrote:
On Jun 23, 2007, at 5:51 PM, Jonathan deWerd wrote:
But I would like to get some of your thoughts.
Anything akin to 3DKit would be excellent :-)
<http://www.cilinder.be/docs/next/NeXTStep/3.3/nd/>
-> <http://www.cilinder.be/docs/next/NeXTStep/3.3/nd/GeneralRef/
17_3DKit/Intro3DKit.htmld/index.html>
mmalc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFGfubGLa+2/Iu5GqERAqZkAKCeRQ0b5Btn1r3SMnqllT2DosbE+gCcDlt7
PU/tLSTQc5STzWjHgnllylg=
=1p2m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden