• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: 32-bit on 10.8
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 32-bit on 10.8


  • Subject: Re: 32-bit on 10.8
  • From: Andy Lee <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 02:31:28 -0400
  • Sun-java-system-smtp-warning: Lines longer than SMTP allows found and wrapped.

If developers should transition to 64-bit (as Greg says they should), then:

* The docs are outdated and misleading.
* This is bad for developers who assume the docs are up-to-date and reliable.
* Right or wrong, some developers will fall into this category.
* It behooves Apple to update the docs, for the sake of those developers.

It seems to me Jayson agrees with all the above, while making a point of not commenting on his own work or making predictions about the future of 32-bit.

Differences of opinion seem to be in the following areas.

* If Developer X blindly believes the docs and doesn't check the cocoa-dev archives, do they deserve what they get?
* If Developer Y is aware of this issue, are they morally obliged to file a Radar and/or documentation feedback?

I am not offering an answer to either of these questions, but for the record, because of this thread, I submitted documentation feedback at the link posted earlier. For those who've never done this, it's *much* easier than a Radar (though I don't know if it has the same impact on priorities at Apple). See the feedback links at the bottom of the page:

<https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#documentation/Darwin/Conceptual/64bitPorting/indications/indications.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40001064-CH206-TPXREF101>
> Please update this document to flatly recommend transitioning apps to 64-bit. Many of the caveats are no longer applicable.
>
> See http://lists.apple.com/archives/cocoa-dev/2012/Aug/msg00330.html.

Here's what it looked like before I hit Submit: <http://imgur.com/3hJW5>.

--Andy

_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >32-bit on 10.8 (From: koko <email@hidden>)
 >Re: 32-bit on 10.8 (From: koko <email@hidden>)
 >Re: 32-bit on 10.8 (From: Charles Srstka <email@hidden>)
 >Re: 32-bit on 10.8 (From: Kurt Bigler <email@hidden>)
 >Re: 32-bit on 10.8 (From: Nick Zitzmann <email@hidden>)
 >Re: 32-bit on 10.8 (From: Charles Srstka <email@hidden>)
 >Re: 32-bit on 10.8 (From: Jayson Adams <email@hidden>)
 >Re: 32-bit on 10.8 (From: Charles Srstka <email@hidden>)
 >Re: 32-bit on 10.8 (From: Jayson Adams <email@hidden>)
 >Re: 32-bit on 10.8 (From: Charles Srstka <email@hidden>)
 >Re: 32-bit on 10.8 (From: Jayson Adams <email@hidden>)
 >Re: 32-bit on 10.8 (From: Charles Srstka <email@hidden>)
 >Re: 32-bit on 10.8 (From: Jayson Adams <email@hidden>)
 >Re: 32-bit on 10.8 (From: Gwynne Raskind <email@hidden>)
 >Re: 32-bit on 10.8 (From: Jayson Adams <email@hidden>)
 >Re: 32-bit on 10.8 (From: Graham Cox <email@hidden>)
 >Re: 32-bit on 10.8 (From: Jayson Adams <email@hidden>)
 >Re: 32-bit on 10.8 (From: Jayson Adams <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: 32-bit on 10.8
  • Next by Date: Re: Forcing IB in Xcode 4.4 to notice a change
  • Previous by thread: Re: 32-bit on 10.8
  • Next by thread: Re: 32-bit on 10.8
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread