Re: 32-bit on 10.8
Re: 32-bit on 10.8
- Subject: Re: 32-bit on 10.8
- From: Mike Abdullah <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:31:00 +0100
On 13 Aug 2012, at 20:40, Greg Parker <email@hidden> wrote:
> On Aug 11, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Jayson Adams <email@hidden> wrote:
>> Poor reading skills are keeping this thread alive. No, I have not been saying anything related to whatever work I may or may not have that's related to 64-bit porting. What I have been ranting and raving about is the fact that the 64-bit porting guide currently states that you may not want to move to 64-bit. That is the official advice any straggler developer will see right at this moment when they consult that document. If Apple decides to just up-and-drop 32-bit support, anyone relying on this official bit of Apple documentation, as it currently stands, between now and then will be screwed. If Apple is considering dropping 32-bit support they need to change this piece of documentation.
>
> You're right, that documentation is out of date with respect to our current recommendations. You should file a bug report for the benefit of any straggler developers out there.
>
>
>> And no, I am not going to file a bug on it.
>
> Oh.
I used the feedback link at the bottom of the page. Is there any appreciable difference between the two? In the past my documentation radars seem to have gone mostly ignored.
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden