Re: Does anyone find Restore Snapshot kind of weak?
Re: Does anyone find Restore Snapshot kind of weak?
- Subject: Re: Does anyone find Restore Snapshot kind of weak?
- From: Kyle Sluder <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:35:19 -0800
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012, at 11:16 AM, Charles Srstka wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2012, at 1:08 PM, Kyle Sluder <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 29, 2012, at 10:47 AM, Charles Srstka <email@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >> On Nov 29, 2012, at 9:48 AM, Kyle Sluder <email@hidden> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> One might argue that it would be a good idea for Xcode to offer the
> >>> ability to commit snapshots to a branch on the git repo to which all the
> >>> affected files belong, if one such repo exists. That seems a lot less of
> >>> a burden that writing a wrapper for interactive rebase.
> >>
> >> That works. This, too, would be more efficient than having a whole separate repository.
> >
> > Well, it only works if all the source files belong to the same repo. It fails in the presence of submodules or disparate checkouts.
>
> Why couldn't you add a branch to each individual repo and commit the
> files to each as necessary?
What's your mechanism for tying all these repos together so that when
you roll back a snapshot it happens atomically across all files?
If Xcode's gonna muck with my repo, I want to be able to revert it.
That's kind of the essence of version control.
--Kyle Sluder
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden