Re: Profilemaker 3.1 vs. PrintOpen 4.0
Re: Profilemaker 3.1 vs. PrintOpen 4.0
- Subject: Re: Profilemaker 3.1 vs. PrintOpen 4.0
- From: Henrik Holmegaard <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 23:20:02 +0100
"Broudy, David" <email@hidden> wrote:
>
also noticed that the Mac version of PO4 creates profiles with a different
>
gamut shape than the Windoze version when both are fed the same input data,
>
if I then use MeasureTool to compare them
Hmm...why'd you use the MeasureTool, and I wonder how.
>
that aside, what are some objective reasons to prefer one app over another?
>
both drive my spectroscan fine. I'm using the IT8 CMYK target; any reason
>
not to? I chose it because it can be used with either app.
This is one of those things, like black backing -:). The IT8.7-3 is not
visually spaced, so there are redundant patches. The recommended PrintOpen
testchart is the 840 patch extended, and the recommended ProfileMaker
testchart is the TC6.02. That said there has been much work done on
improving the results for IT8.7-3 data sets.
-------------------
TechWrite
Henrik Holmegaard
Toelloesevej 69
2700 Broenshoej
DENMARK
Stationary +45 3880 0721 / +45 3881 0721
Mobile +45 2178 3959
-------------------