• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: colorsync-users digest, Vol 2 #450 - 17 msgs
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: colorsync-users digest, Vol 2 #450 - 17 msgs


  • Subject: Re: colorsync-users digest, Vol 2 #450 - 17 msgs
  • From: email@hidden
  • Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 10:30:25 EDT

In a message dated 8/2/01 8:52:06 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
email@hidden writes:


> Conversions between working spaces, and conversions into working
> spaces from capture spaces, are ALWAYS relative colorimetric. The
> tables may say they're preceptual, but I bet you dollars to doughnuts
> you'll get identical results using RelCol and Perceptual...
>
> Bruce, I'm afraid I missed something here. You said you use RelCol vs
Percept. Then you indicate that they will be identical results. Since we tend
to stay in Percept (by your command of checking to make sure it's set in
Advanced, close it never go back again), why bother with the switch?
Joe Butts


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: colorsync-users digest, Vol 2 #450 - 17 msgs
      • From: email@hidden (Bruce Fraser)
  • Prev by Date: Re: list is now searchable
  • Next by Date: Re: colorsync-users digest, Vol 2 #449 - 15 msgs
  • Previous by thread: Re: 8 bit vs 16 bit workflow
  • Next by thread: Re: colorsync-users digest, Vol 2 #450 - 17 msgs
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread