• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Conversion Steps/PRO/Observations
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Conversion Steps/PRO/Observations


  • Subject: Re: Conversion Steps/PRO/Observations
  • From: email@hidden (Bruce Fraser)
  • Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2001 10:25:01 -0700

At 5:52 AM -0500 8/5/01, Bob Smith wrote:
Bruce Fraser wrote:


What's the reason for doing all of the toning in Photoshop as opposed to
doing at least part of it within ColorFlex and allowing ColorFlex to make
the transform from scanner RGB to ProPhoto RGB?

The reasons for doing all the toning in Photoshop are that

1.) In Photoshop, I can see every pixel

2.) Photoshop offers me more control, more conveniently, than ColorFlex

I do allow ColorFlex to make the conversion from scanner RGB to ProPhoto RGB.

Bruce
--
email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Conversion Steps/PRO/Observations
      • From: email@hidden
References: 
 >Re: Conversion Steps/PRO/Observations (From: Bob Smith <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Monitor Profiles Missing
  • Next by Date: Re: Conversion Steps/PRO/Observations
  • Previous by thread: Re: Conversion Steps/PRO/Observations
  • Next by thread: Re: Conversion Steps/PRO/Observations
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread