Re: Conversion Steps/PRO/Observations
Re: Conversion Steps/PRO/Observations
- Subject: Re: Conversion Steps/PRO/Observations
- From: Bob Smith <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2001 05:52:10 -0500
Bruce Fraser wrote:
>
It may well be that the workflow I've been discussing is fairly
>
specific to the Imacon scanner. It's predicated on making raw 48-bit
>
scans, which are always flat and unsaturated, converting the raw scan
>
from scanner RGB to ProPhoto RGB, then editing entirely in Photoshop,
>
and almost all in 48-bit.
What's the reason for doing all of the toning in Photoshop as opposed to
doing at least part of it within ColorFlex and allowing ColorFlex to make
the transform from scanner RGB to ProPhoto RGB?
Bob Smith