• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Workflow critique needed
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Workflow critique needed


  • Subject: Re: Workflow critique needed
  • From: Henrik Holmegaard <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 19:22:55 +0100

The problem that I've experienced is if you check that lab values that your
solid primaries should be producing through the profile, and actually
measure such patches on screen, the variance can be huge.

A while back I read the advertising of a well-known monitor manufacturer to do with the accuracy of said manufacturer's monitor profiles independently of anything else in the workflow. The idea seemed to be that of apportioning blame, 'See, if our monitor can show this color and the rest of the workflow can't then it follows that our monitor isn't to blame for the fact that your color came out wrong'. That sort of idea ... hence looking a little at what may be meant by 'accuracy' in a broad context and for people struggling to climb aboard.

--
Henrik Holmegaard
TechWrite, Denmark


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Workflow critique needed
      • From: Chris Halford <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: IT8 Scanning Standards
  • Next by Date: Re: Workflow critique needed
  • Previous by thread: Re: Workflow critique needed
  • Next by thread: Re: Workflow critique needed
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread