• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: What does PCS stand for? - color engine
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: What does PCS stand for? - color engine

  • Subject: Re: What does PCS stand for? - color engine
  • From: "Andre Schützenhofer" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 19:09:41 +0200
Jim wrote:

We believe ACE is the best CMM to use.


Hello all,

I'm sure this has been discussed many times before and I'm sorry for this basic question, but why do you believe ACE is best to use? (oh no not this question again) I use Apple CMM because it gives acceptable results to me and can be used by all programs supporting colorsync. So I made no accurate tests with other CMMs. Are the differences big enough to favour ACE?

hope answering is not to boring to you ...

thanks in advance for any comments, Andre
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

  • Prev by Date: Re: yellow Epson
  • Next by Date: marcom of CM (was: ScannerRGB to WorkingSpaceRGB (rendering intents))
  • Previous by thread: Re: Moniter Calabration
  • Next by thread: marcom of CM (was: ScannerRGB to WorkingSpaceRGB (rendering intents))
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread