Re: Mach1 RIP and ColorByte
Re: Mach1 RIP and ColorByte
- Subject: Re: Mach1 RIP and ColorByte
- From: Gary Smith <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 07:22:42 -0600
Your experiences with Praxisoft are the same as mine. I have been
asking questions of their tech support for technical issues and sales
(Robert Eversole) for sales issues and they rarely respond to me.
This has caused me to investigate other products & companies
extensively. I feel like I wasted a few thousand bucks on them. I am
open to amends if one of them reads this and actually responds.
Gary Smith
> Now you can take my word for it or not, I am too busy making up for lost
revenues due to Colorbyte RIPs that my customers have sent back because they
are too clumsy, don't install correctly or offer poor color.
Stop spreading innuendoes with your open questions and request facts from
those involved. And Mr. "Paul Frehely" at frenchlick@altavista, you can
stop propagating lies cowardly hidden off-list.
Speaking of unprofessional, I find this type of "venting" on the Colorsync
list to be most unprofessional.
As a customer caught in the middle of the Mach 1 debacle, I was faced with a
choice of continuing with the Colorbyte RIP or switching to the new Ergosoft
product. My experience with Praxisofts level of tech support (almost none)
led me to stick with the smaller and more responsive Colorbyte. I would get
responses from Praxisoft that ranged from: "well, all of our people are at a
trade show" or just plain never responding to my emails for tech support.
On the other hand, I have always had excellent tech support from Colorbyte
and they have even gone as far as producind custom profiles for me when I've
run into profiling problems.
Additionally, I have been quite satisfied with the Colorbyte RIP and has
performed exceedingly well.
This is not a "soap opera" nor a "cowardly lie", it is simply the truth
based on my experiences.
Sincerely,
Tim Catlin
Electric Ouzel Imaging