• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
CMYK to Lab bug (part 1)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

CMYK to Lab bug (part 1)


  • Subject: CMYK to Lab bug (part 1)
  • From: Henrik Holmegaard <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 18:31:28 +0100

The bug is isolated to Photoshop and Distiller. Linocolor and other applications behave correctly with Distiller, Photoshop behaves incorrectly with Distiller. The Photoshop behaviour is identical for v5.0 and v6.0 and for Acrobat 3 / PDF 1.2 compatibility and Acrobat 4 / PDF 1.4 compatibility. The problem has nothing to do with the PDF 1.2 and PDF 1.3 format, only with the Adobe implementations. One could argue that the problem with ICC color management is a problem with Adobe implementations, but I already made that point once or twice before -:).

Also I should have tested this long ago. PostScript Color Management is an unimplemented implemented technology that I don't spend any time on - except the problems. But given the logical designer and prepress behaviour this mental block was clearly a mistake.

The problem: There are two aspects to CMYK, first that the ink densities are right for the process and second that the color is correctly managed. If the ink densities are wrong then the physics of the printing process are in trouble (e.g. drying, smearing), and if the color is wrong then the customer is unhappy. The problem with converting CMYK to Lab is that the separation (ink limit and black generation) are lost, even if the colors may remain right. Losing the separation parameters by converting into a three channel space is the KEY reason the whole prepress and printing industry deeply distrusts late binding three channel workflows (RGB and Lab) - after a decade of problems with in-RIP color management. The current bug would have taken an Adobe engineer with a simple matrix at most three hours to fix in the beta phase, and now cause users problems they have to solve on their own without a central source for a fix.

Designer behaviour: The user now knows that she always has to tag her CMYK or she will not be able to softproof and proof print it in true colors. Therefore, she correctly selects the available tagging options. There are two tagging options for EPS so both tagging options are selected, ICC and 'PostScript Color Management'. A lot of people have asked here on the List whether they are supposed to select PSCM. They ask that question because neither the Adobe manuals nor the add-on manuals I've read from the US writers talk about printing and about in-RIP color management. So what are users supposed to believe? (Who says designers are ignorant? They aren't ignorant in the least.)

Prepress / printer behaviour: The designer has selected the right ICC profile in Photoshop and fully understands that it both handles the separation parameters and the color management. The prepress or press operator has verified that the right profile is embedded, and that the CMYK is correct for the intended printing process. Therefore, in Distiller she asks that the colors be left unchanged. (Who says prepress and press operators are ignorant? They aren't ignorant in the least.)

Adobe behaviour: In the UI and documentation there is no distinction between ICC format color space specifications and PostScript format color space specifications. The internal technical writers use the same word for both, 'profiles'. This is not helpful because the formats are different, the functionality is different and the behaviour is different - even for the only two applications that support PostScript format color space specifications, namely Photoshop and Distiller.

Distiller 4.0.5, 'Acrobat 3 Compatibility' and 'Leave Colors Unchanged' for a CMYK image using the same Adobe bundled ICC CMYK device profile :

PS5_TagICC_TagPSCM = Converted to Lab
PS5_TagICC_UntagPSCM = DeviceCMYK
PS5_UntagICC_TagPSCM = Converted to Lab
PS5_UntagICC_UntagPSCM = DeviceCMYK

PS6_TagICC_TagPSCM = Converted to Lab
PS6_TagICC_UntagPSCM = DeviceCMYK
PS6_UntagICC_TagPSCM = Converted to Lab
PS6_UntagICC_UntagPSCM = DeviceCMYK

Distiller 4.0.5, 'Acrobat 4 Compatibility' and 'Leave Colors Unchanged' for a CMYK image using the same bundled Adobe ICC CMYK device profile :

PS5_TagICC_TagPSCM = Converted to Lab
PS5_TagICC_UntagPSCM = DeviceCMYK
PS5_UntagICC_TagPSCM = Converted to Lab
PS5_UntagICC_UntagPSCM = DeviceCMYK

PS6_TagICC_TagPSCM = Converted to Lab
PS6_TagICC_UntagPSCM = DeviceCMYK
PS6_UntagICC_TagPSCM = Converted to Lab
PS6_UntagICC_UntagPSCM = DeviceCMYK

Next I'll talk to the LOGO folks to see how their new Swiss army knife of ICC color management can get us out of this.

--
------------------------------------------
Henrik Holmegaard, TechWrite
Stationay +45 3880 0721 - +45 3881 0721
Mobile +45 2178 3959
Toelloesevej 69, 2700 Broenshoej, Denmark
------------------------------------------


  • Prev by Date: Re: Custom paper profiles for Adobe PressReady? Completed...
  • Next by Date: Call for user feedback for ICC June meeting
  • Previous by thread: ColorSync 3.0.3
  • Next by thread: Re: CMYK to Lab bug (part 1)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread