• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Proofing on Destination Stock
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proofing on Destination Stock


  • Subject: Re: Proofing on Destination Stock
  • From: email@hidden (Lee Blevins)
  • Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 08:57:18 -0400
  • Organization: Digital Graphics, Inc.

> My question is: Doesn't a different profile need to be created for every
> type of stock used on the proofing device? And if so, why does it matter if
> relative or absolute rendering intent is used? Won't the profile creation
> software pick up that the paper is different and adjust colours accordingly?
> If Absolute means 1 to 1 conversion, won't there be very little (if any)
> conversion on the whites? The press stock would be almost identical to the
> white of the proofing device stock.

My own experience with this is that absolute colorimetric didn't work.

We made a profile of Matchrpint and then profiled Iris.

Doing a profile to profile in photoshop added a yellow cast to the
background of the paper.

The yellow cast didn't help. It was much darker than the matchprint
base. Our customers who viewed the proof all rejected it.


References: 
 >Proofing on Destination Stock (From: Tom Beckenham <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re(2): AW: Analyzing Workflow
  • Next by Date: Re: Bestcolor & Epson 1280
  • Previous by thread: Proofing on Destination Stock
  • Next by thread: Re: Proofing on Destination Stock
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread