Re: WMU Profiling Review 1.0
Re: WMU Profiling Review 1.0
- Subject: Re: WMU Profiling Review 1.0
- From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 16:43:06 -0500
>
WMU Profiling Review 1.0
>
>
This is to tell you of a report we have done on profiling software to be
>
presented at the TAGA Technical Conference, Asheville, North Carolina, April
>
14, 2002.
>
>
1) Here are the results for quality of the input (scanner) profile. Lower
>
Delta E is better.
>
>
Product Delta E
>
>
LinoColor 2.1.0 1.02
>
Gretag PM 4.0 1.02
>
Gretag PM 3.1.3 1.06
>
Monaco Profiler 4.0 1.10
>
Fuji ColourKit Profiler 2.2 1.28
>
ColorSynergy 4.5 2.86
>
Kodak ColorFlow 2.2.1 8.27
>
Monaco Profiler 3.2 8.33
>
Generic Scanner Profile 29.37
Abhay,
In your results, do you mean "ScanOpen" instead of LinoColor? Because
LinoColor does not create input profiles.
Best regards,
Roger Breton
Laval, Canada
email@hidden
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.