RE: Rendering Intents
RE: Rendering Intents
- Subject: RE: Rendering Intents
- From: "Quentin Bargate" <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 21:00:08 +0100
am 29.08.2002 0:28 Uhr schrieb Quentin Bargate unter email@hidden:
>
your observations are similar to mine. From a colorimetrical point of view
>
related to source/destination transforming issues: If the colorspace you
are
>
converting to contains most of the source space colors (or at least if it
is
>
similar or bigger), relative colorimetric gives better results because
>
clipping does not play a (visible) role.
>
Chosing perceptual will end up in shifting of colors (just like you
noticed)
>
due to gamut compression or - in some cases - gamut expansion. Since all
>
manufacturers of profile-creating-tools follow different gamut mapping
>
strategies, the results will be different, which does not mean bad, just
>
different.
>
If you want to maintain the look of the image in a colorimetric sense, I
>
would chose relative colorimetric with black point compensation switched
on.
>
Your destination colorspace should be large enough. Or use a profile
created
>
by a program which perceptual rendering results matches your taste.
>
Just like Andrew Rodney wrote in a post answering yours, use the one you
>
like the most!
>
And fortunately, there will be a solution to the
>
different-perceptual-rendering-intents-problem soon.
>
Regards, Andre
Andre,
I'm glad I'm not going mad, and others have found they have similar
experiences :-)
I am intrigued by the last sentence of your post. Are you talking about new
software, or some standardisation of perceptual rendering intent by
agreement? I hope you are able to tell us a little more...
--
Quentin
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.