Re: ScreenProof vs. BlackMagic for 1-Bit TIFFs
Re: ScreenProof vs. BlackMagic for 1-Bit TIFFs
- Subject: Re: ScreenProof vs. BlackMagic for 1-Bit TIFFs
- From: Mario Kühn <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 09:06:08 +0100
>
> BEST has the advantage over
>
> BlackMagic of accepting plain PostScript files and turn them to
halftone
>
> dots
>
This is incorrect. If you supply Best ScreenProof with Postscript
you get
>
stochastic screening the same as if it were a ColorProof RIP. The
only way
>
ScreenProof simulates halftone screening is if you send 1-Bit TIFF
files.
Best Screenproof handle PS-files like in Best Colorproof with a
stochastic screening. So the software dosn't simulate an other
screening. But may be Mr. Brenton means monobit DCS files from Copydot
scanners or from other applications. In this case Best Screenproof
handle the datas exactly in the same way like monobit tiff files
because the files are monobits.
Regards
Mario Kuehn
Research Manager
Best GmbH
Tel:+49-(0)2151-7627-100
Mevissenstr. 65
Fax:+49-(0)2151-7627-200
47803 Krefeld <
mailto:email@hidden>
Germany www.bestcolor.com
New training by the BestAcademy, get more info on our website!
www.bestcolor.com
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.