Re: An Observation
Re: An Observation
- Subject: Re: An Observation
- From: neil snape <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 14:12:01 +0100
on 13/02/2002 13:46, Brian Dondero at email@hidden wrote:
>
I to work in the color department for a print shop and we don't use
>
any monitor calibration or profiles for are PhotoShop work.
Still some educating possible then for your the prepress house.
>
I must agree with John he's hit it on the head if folks don't go
>
by the values in their HL,MT, AND SD. areas of a image its not
>
going to look good no mather how it looks on screen, printing is
>
done with dots Values
>
we see lots of work come in now and the images are just no good
>
they look bad on press and once we bring these files into photoshop
>
and look at the values we are seeing hilites blown out 0% and the
>
shadows are plug in.
Still some educating possible then for us as suppliers.
>
So I don't see how Bruce can say you don't have the setup to evaluate
>
files from outside, all you need to do is look at the info in photoshop
>
to see poeple are not going by values but I'm guessing by how it looks
>
on screen
Your mixing up two things. Pilots can fly a jet without instruments. You're
only using the minimum indicators. Wouldn't it be easier to "see" the whole
picture by using all the indicators to your advantage?
Files coming in that are incorrect for output are the creators
responsibility. Colorsync doesn't promise or cover for lack of education or
training. It does however offer portable desktop color for those correctly
applying it to color imagery.
>
Doing it by the numbers is all that should count
That's the base of all digital processing , but qualifying the numbers leads
to better globalisation of those numbers.
Neil Snape email@hidden
http://mapage.noos.fr/nsnape
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.