• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: was: Brightener in Epson Premium Glossy
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: was: Brightener in Epson Premium Glossy


  • Subject: Re: was: Brightener in Epson Premium Glossy
  • From: "Adriano Von Markendorf" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 09:11:27 -0300

<snip>
> <http://mitglied.lycos.de/whiteness/BrightnessReview.pdf>.

Good article, thank's to put it on the table.

> The paper touches on what effect using a UV filter has on
> measurement (enough to convince me that UV filters are
> useless when trying to create color profiles, as opposed to
> measuring paper whiteness).

Very intersting subject. I hear somany times the same argument.
I wondering if this kind of problem could be cause problems reading pure
yellows patches, I mean, the resulting profile come with somany cyan and/or
magenta - more noticiable in 100Y using semmigloss media (some uv, about 4)
and Guardian inks -
A very funny thing is, I get practically the same problem using Colorblind 4
and ProfileMaker 4, I haven't tested with PO 4.

> There is no doubt that the presence of UV brighteners makes the
> appearance of a print more dependent than ever on subtle
> characteristics of the light source.

Could be better use a non-UV reader with a diferrent light source like
spectrocam? they claim to get better espectral response (lees uv reading and
a little more wavelenght range) from your xenon light.

> I think the simplest way of avoiding these sorts of problems in proofing,
> is to try and match the whitener content of the proofing paper to
> that of the target. Even if the different effects the instrument
illumination
> has on the whitener compared to the viewing illumination, is fully
> compensated for in the profiling software, any differences in the
> UV level of the actual viewing conditions can cause noticeable shifts
> in color.

I saw in the list comments about this capacity of abstract the uv component
from PM4.

Regards,

Adriano von Markendorf email@hidden
"I-C-Cm vitamin's inside" Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

References: 
 >was: Brightener in Epson Premium Glossy (From: neil snape <email@hidden>)
 >Re: was: Brightener in Epson Premium Glossy (From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Questions about Status T and E
  • Next by Date: RE: BEST or CGS
  • Previous by thread: Re: Questions on optical brighteners, uv and fluorescence
  • Next by thread: Re: Brightner in Epson Premium Glossy
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread