• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Questions about Status T and E
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Questions about Status T and E


  • Subject: Re: Questions about Status T and E
  • From: Marcelo Copetti <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 08:47:31 -0300

Good morning,

OK, what are the rules to get a good gray balance with Status E?

I think is necessary to have all inks (CMY) with a very similar ink
density value.

Is that correct?

Thanks for your attention and help

On quinta-feira, set 26, 2002, at 21:44 Brazil/East, Terry Wyse wrote:

> on 9/26/02 11:52 AM, neil snape wrote:
>
>> According to Best no differences should result between status E or T
>> in the
>> base linearisations. I believe that the Gretag i1 and Spectro lino's
>> will
>> only make status E base lin values , but that could have changed
>> recently.
>
> I think it was the other way around Neil. Prior to 4.6.x, they only
> supported Status T for the Eye-One and 'Lino. Now both Status T and E
> are
> supported, as they did prior to v4.5.x. Personally, even though I'm in
> the
> U.S., I preferred Status E for creating a baselin as it was much
> easier to
> get a "gray balanced" baselin prior to profiling. Status T was always
> a lot
> of guesswork to get reasonably balanced CMY ink limits.
>
> Lately I've been going back and forth between BestColor RIPs and the
> fairly
> new RAMpage RIP ICC Option. I've really sort of abandoned the whole
> notion
> of using density to determine ink limits and have gone with evaluating
> Lab
> values along with an eye of newt and a dash of salt (IOW, using a
> little
> magic)! for the last several inkjet printers this has worked better,
> especially for the "quality" of the yellow in the proof simulation.
> Before,
> I would always fight a scum dot of cyan in my pure "press" yellows
> because
> of the "orange" nature of the Epson pure yellow. As a result of using
> Lab
> values to set limits, I'm getting the cleanest yellows ever. I don't
> claim
> to really know/understand the science of what I'm doing, all I know is
> I'm
> getting much better results in the field where it counts.
>
> Terry
> __________________________________
> WyseConsul
> Color Management Consulting
> v 704.843.0858
> e email@hidden
> __________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
> Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
> http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

[demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of Logo Image Pixel web.jpg]
Marcelo Copetti
Image Sistemas/Pixel Systems
Gerente de Suporte/Support Manager
Rua Francisco Nunes, 1739/ 1739 Francisco Nunes st
Curitiba - PR - Brasil
CEP/ZIP: 80215-000
Tel(Phone): 55 41 333-7778 ext 43
Fax: 55 41 333-5222
Celular (Cell): 55 41 9968-3032
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Questions about Status T and E
      • From: matt louis <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Questions about Status T and E (From: Terry Wyse <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Questions on optical brighteners, uv and fluorescence
  • Next by Date: Re: was: Brightener in Epson Premium Glossy
  • Previous by thread: Re: Questions about Status T and E
  • Next by thread: Re: Questions about Status T and E
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread