Re: Digital Camera Profiling...Why can't we all just get along?
Re: Digital Camera Profiling...Why can't we all just get along?
- Subject: Re: Digital Camera Profiling...Why can't we all just get along?
- From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 08:20:04 -0400
>
Grame wrote:
>
I don't believe that more renderings combined with profiles
>
will help in any way. Much of the confusion and difficulty in
>
the current state of color management is due to the unfortunate
>
combining of device characterization and intent (including
>
the oxymoron "single ended gamut mapping") by the ICC profile
>
standard. Now that the computation and algorithmic capabilities
>
have advanced sufficiently, I believe it would be much better
>
if characterization was distinctly separated from intent. Because
>
intent is the subject of art, environment and whim, there is
>
endless scope for different personal choices. Characterization doesn't
>
need this. There is generally an exact, measurable definitions of the
>
colorimetric characterization of a device.
>
>
Graeme Gill.
What kind of 'model' will separating characterization from intent afford us?
Do you foresee profiles only carrying characteriztion data, leading us into
"intelligent CMM"? Meaning that rendering is best left as a 'run-time'
decision? Have you attempted that in Argyle?
Regards,
Roger Breton
Laval, Canada
email@hidden
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.